Tony Bennett: The Ideal Example of Good College Basketball, Despite the Drawbacks
When it comes to college athletics, Tony Bennett is the epitome of what is right and good. He embodies the qualities of a decent man, exemplifying humility, passion, unity, servanthood, and thankfulness. However, there is a conundrum surrounding Bennett’s basketball team – they are currently unwatchable. While it may feel wrong to criticize someone who does everything right, the fact remains that Virginia’s gameplay is not only ugly but also unsuccessful.
In the past three years, the Cavaliers have been eliminated from the NCAA Tournament in two first rounds and one First Four. Their scoring average in these games is a mere 55 points, and they have been defeated by equal or lower-seeded teams each time. The recent First Four game against Colorado State was particularly disappointing, with Virginia managing to score only 42 points throughout the entire game. This lack of success raises questions about why someone like Bennett, who does everything right, is struggling on the court.
It is important to note that Bennett’s father, Dick Bennett, invented the pack line defense and faced significant criticism during his coaching career at Wisconsin. When Virginia became the first 1-seed to be upset by a 16-seed in 2018, Tony Bennett faced a hailstorm of criticism as well. However, the Cavaliers went on to win the national championship in 2019, quieting the doubters. But now, with their recent performance, doubts have resurfaced.
The selection committee’s decision to include Virginia in the tournament has also come under fire. Many argue that other teams, such as Indiana State with its beautiful brand of offensive basketball, should have been selected instead. While it is not as simple as an either/or decision when selecting teams for the tournament, it is fair to question the committee’s choice to include Virginia given their poor offensive performance.
Virginia’s struggles this year can be attributed to various factors. Three key players transferred at the end of last season, leaving Bennett with a lack of experienced players. These players, Isaac Traudt, Kadin Shedrick, and Casey Morsell, have found success with their new teams in the tournament. This loss of experience has undoubtedly impacted Virginia’s gameplay.
Despite these challenges, Bennett’s commitment to his coaching style is commendable. He believes in his system and refuses to waver from it. This steadfastness is often admired in coaches, as those who constantly change their approach rarely find long-term success. Additionally, Virginia’s approach to NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) aligns with the school’s high academic standards and integrity. While other schools may go all-in on NIL opportunities, Virginia has taken a more practical approach.
However, when combining Virginia’s scoring struggles with their practical approach to NIL, it becomes a valid concern whether their button-down style of basketball can thrive in a sport that feels more like a 1970s disco hall. It may be necessary for Bennett to reevaluate his coaching approach and consider making changes to adapt to the evolving landscape of college basketball.
In conclusion, Tony Bennett is an exemplary figure in college basketball, embodying the qualities of a good coach and person. However, his team’s recent struggles raise questions about their offensive capabilities and their ability to compete in a sport that demands high-scoring games. While it is important to recognize Bennett’s commitment and integrity, it may be time for him to consider adjusting his coaching style to meet the demands of the modern game. Only time will tell if Bennett can find a balance between staying true to his convictions and making necessary changes for success on the court.