The Premier League has announced that all of its clubs have collectively agreed to withdraw gambling sponsorship from the front of their matchday shirts by the end of the 2025-26 season. This decision follows a consultation between the league, its clubs and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport as part of the government’s ongoing review of current gambling legislation. The league is also working with other sports on the development of a new code for responsible gambling sponsorship.
The plans were largely agreed by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson before he stepped down and were not expected to be proposed by the government as a ban. Instead, the plan was for the Premier League to agree voluntarily to a change. Eight top-flight clubs have gambling companies on the front of their shirts, worth an estimated £60m per year.
The decision will see the Premier League become the first sports league in the UK to take such a measure voluntarily in order to reduce gambling advertising. After the deadline, clubs will still be able to continue featuring gambling brands in areas such as shirt sleeves and LED advertising. And clubs will be allowed to secure new shirt-front deals before the deadline.
Campaigners for a wider ban say gambling sponsorship in football has normalised the industry, and that tighter regulation is needed to protect children and other vulnerable groups. The Betting and Gambling Council, which represents the industry, said the “overwhelming majority” of the 22.5m people in the UK who bet each month, do so “safely and responsibly”. It added the “rate of problem gambling remains low by international standards at 0.3% of the UK’s adult population – down from 0.4% the year previous”.
Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith is part of the All Party Parliamentary Group on gambling-related harm, which has been lobbying the government for tougher protections. He said: “At the moment, we are probably the country with the most liberal gambling laws in the world.” In January, Aston Villa’s fan consultation group met chief executive Christian Purslow after the club was reported to have signed a deal with Asia-based betting firm BK8. It later issued a statement saying “the commercial reality is that to teams outside the top six, such sponsors offer clubs twice as much financially as non-gambling companies”.
The collective agreement to start the ban after 2025-26 has been reached to assist clubs with their transition away from shirt-front gambling sponsorship. The Big Step, a campaign to end gambling advertising and sponsorship in football led by people harmed by gambling, said that just over three years ago nearly 30 clubs in the Premier League and the Championship had a gambling company on the front of their shirt. They added that without government action on all forms of gambling ads in football, at every level, online casinos will exploit any voluntary measures and continue to market their products through our national sport.
The English Football League (EFL), which is sponsored by Sky Bet, has previously said any outright gambling sponsorship ban for its 72 members would cost clubs £40m a year. The Premier League has previously said “a self-regulatory approach would provide a practical and flexible alternative to legislation or outright prohibition”.
The Premier League’s move to ban gambling sponsorship from matchday shirts by 2026 is a huge step forward in reducing gambling advertising in football. It is a significant acceptance of the harm caused by gambling sponsorship and shows that the league is taking social issues seriously. Although this outcome isn’t perfect, it is a positive move that will help protect vulnerable groups from being exposed to gambling advertising.
The government and other sports now need to follow suit and take action to reduce all forms of gambling advertising in football. Delaying this moment is risking the health and lives of another generation of young fans. The Premier League’s decision shows that it is possible to make positive changes and that football can be a force for good in society.