Analysis: Phil Foden’s Performance for England at the Euros
Introduction:
In this analysis, former professional footballer Micah Richards discusses Phil Foden’s performance for the England national team at the Euros. Richards argues that Foden’s lackluster performances are not solely his fault but rather a result of tactical issues and the team’s style of play.
The Impact of Positioning:
Richards highlights the importance of Foden’s positioning on the pitch. He explains that when playing on the left for England, Foden is often unable to showcase his skills due to the team’s deep defensive setup. In contrast, at Manchester City, Foden thrives in a more advanced position, playing short and quick passes on the edge of the area. Richards emphasizes that Foden’s strengths lie in his ability to open up defenses with his passing or score goals, but this requires him to be deployed in the right role.
Tactical Considerations:
Richards further argues that England did not utilize Foden effectively in their quarter-final against Switzerland. Although Foden played as a central number 10, the team dropped back and did not play in areas that allowed him to influence the game. Richards believes that blaming Foden for this is unfair, as he was not given the opportunity to play to his strengths.
Competition with Jude Bellingham:
Richards acknowledges that part of Foden’s struggle stems from the competition with Jude Bellingham, who also operates as a number 10. He explains that Bellingham’s runs sometimes make it difficult for Foden to get on the ball and establish himself in the game. However, Richards emphasizes that it takes time for understanding and chemistry to develop between players and that judging Foden after just one game in this new role is premature.
The Defensive Identity:
Richards highlights that England’s coach, Gareth Southgate, has built a successful team with a defensive approach. He notes that Southgate’s style of play prioritizes defensive solidity over attacking prowess. Therefore, Richards suggests that it would be unfair to expect a more attack-minded approach from Southgate and that Foden should be given more opportunities to prove himself within the team’s current system.
Adapting to Changes:
Richards also discusses Harry Kane’s situation, noting that Kane has had to adjust his game to accommodate Bellingham’s role as a deep-lying playmaker. He emphasizes the need for Kane to trust his teammates and stay high up the pitch, as this allows him to utilize his goal-scoring abilities. Richards acknowledges that the entire team is still adapting to changes and finding their rhythm but points out that despite this, England has reached another semi-final in a major tournament.
Being Braver with In-Game Changes:
In conclusion, Richards calls for a braver approach to in-game changes. While he does not advocate for dropping Kane or Foden, he believes that bringing on impact players from the bench earlier in the game could freshen up England’s attack. Richards argues that the squad’s depth should be utilized more effectively and that these substitutions could make a difference in the semi-final against the Netherlands.
Overall, Richards provides valuable insights into Foden’s performance at the Euros, highlighting the tactical issues and team dynamics that have affected his contribution. He calls for a fair assessment of Foden’s abilities and emphasizes the need for adaptability and bravery in England’s approach to the semi-final match.