Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Warning Against ‘Absurd’ Ashworth Plan for Newcastle amidst £20m Dispute
In a recent turn of events, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the new supremo of Manchester United, has dismissed Newcastle’s demand for up to £20 million in compensation for Dan Ashworth, labeling it as “silly.” Ashworth, who has been placed on gardening leave by Newcastle, is the top choice for the sporting director position at Manchester United. However, Newcastle’s insistence on an 18-month gardening leave before allowing him to join the club has been met with criticism and disbelief from Ratcliffe.
Ratcliffe expressed his opinion on the situation, stating, “Talking about £20 million seems a bit silly, personally. I won’t get dragged into that.” He further added, “What I do think is completely absurd is suggesting a man who is really good at his job sits in his garden for one and a half years.” Ratcliffe draws a parallel with Manchester City’s approach when they approached Omar Berrada to become their chief executive. He emphasizes the importance of allowing talented individuals to take on new challenges and grow in their careers.
Ratcliffe also highlights the example of Pep Guardiola, who, when finished with a footballer, does not expect them to sit idle for an extended period. He believes that this approach does not align with the way the UK works or how the law operates. Ratcliffe acknowledges Ashworth’s prowess as one of the top sporting directors in the world and expresses his confidence in his capabilities. He sees Manchester United as a significant rebuilding project and believes that Ashworth would be a valuable addition to the team.
While Ratcliffe understands Newcastle’s disappointment, considering their recent success under new ownership, he argues that criticism should not be directed towards Ashworth. He reminds everyone that the sports industry is transient and taking up the challenge offered by Manchester United is the ultimate opportunity for Ashworth.
The dispute between Manchester United and Newcastle over Dan Ashworth’s compensation package highlights the complexities of the football industry. As clubs strive for success and aim to attract top talent, negotiations and disagreements over compensation are inevitable. However, it is essential to find a balance that respects the interests of both parties involved.
In conclusion, Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s dismissal of Newcastle’s demand for a £20 million compensation package for Dan Ashworth sheds light on the tensions and differing perspectives within the football industry. Ratcliffe’s emphasis on allowing talented individuals to pursue new challenges and grow in their careers is a reminder of the ever-evolving nature of the sports world. Ultimately, finding a resolution that benefits all parties involved will be crucial in ensuring the smooth transition of sporting directors and maintaining the integrity of the game.