Manchester United’s decision to sell Aaron Wan-Bissaka to West Ham for £15m and bring in Noussair Mazraoui from Bayern Munich for £12.8m plus add-ons has raised eyebrows among football pundits and former players. Dwight Yorke, a former Manchester United player, believes that Wan-Bissaka is the superior player and that the club made a mistake in letting him go.
Yorke expressed his concerns about the way Mazraoui was used at United, calling it “slightly unprofessional.” He believes that Mazraoui is better suited for an attacking role, with his ability to overlap and contribute in the final third. However, Yorke emphasizes that defending is the most important aspect of a right-back’s game, and that is where Wan-Bissaka excels.
Yorke’s opinion is not unfounded, as Wan-Bissaka’s recent performance for West Ham against Crystal Palace garnered praise from football pundits. Ian Wright, an Arsenal legend and pundit, highlighted Wan-Bissaka’s contribution in the build-up to West Ham’s first goal. Wright commended Wan-Bissaka’s defensive play, his ability to win the ball and keep it in play, leading to an attacking opportunity for his team.
The contrasting performances of Wan-Bissaka and Mazraoui have ignited the debate over Manchester United’s decision to let go of the former and bring in the latter. Yorke’s criticism of the club’s transfer strategy adds weight to the argument that United may have made a mistake in their selection.
It is worth noting that opinions on player performance can vary, and the success of a transfer can only truly be assessed over time. However, Yorke’s remarks highlight the importance of considering a player’s strengths and how they fit into a team’s style of play when making transfer decisions.
Ultimately, the success of Mazraoui at Manchester United and the impact of Wan-Bissaka at West Ham will determine whether the Red Devils made the right choice. For now, the debate rages on, and fans will eagerly watch to see how these two players perform in their new clubs.